|
CAB:
Feedlot Size Can Affect Cattle Grades Feedlot
sizes have been steadily increasing, while quality grades of cattle
continue to drop. “We
think that’s more than a coincidence,” says Larry Corah,
Certified Angus Beef LLC (CAB) vice president. “Larger
feedlots face a number of challenges that contribute to this decrease in
quality grades.” More
than 50% of today’s cattle are fed at yards with more than 32,000-head
capacity. Data from CAB’s Feedlot Licensing Program shows yards larger
than 20,000 head have a 41% lower Certified Angus Beef â
brand acceptance rate than the average of their counterparts. They also
drop 17 to 20 points in the number of cattle grading Choice or higher. “We
recognize that some of the difference could be due to feedlot location,
as most of the larger yards have access to Southern-type cattle,” says
Mark McCully, director of supply development
for CAB. “But cattle that find their way into our dataset tend to be
of similar quality.” Large
and small feedlots generally have differences in the number of health
problems, feeding methods and marketing focus, he says. “Most
larger feedlots use steam-flaked grain, which has been shown to
have a negative effect on marbling,” Corah
says. A 1999 Oklahoma State University (OSU) research review shows steam
flaking rather than dry rolling corn can drop a carcass from a Small
marbling score, 524 points, to a Slight marbling score, or 482 on a
1,000-point scale. “Feeding
steam-flaked corn can lead to external fat deposition instead of
marbling,” Corah says. “This practice is
pretty common in yards greater than 20,000 head. In yards under 5,000
it’s almost unheard of.” Health
is another issue when classifying cattle by feedlot size. “The
closeout data that I’ve seen indicates smaller feedlots tend to have
less death loss,” says Dan Loy, animal science professor at Iowa State
University (ISU). “That may indicate that they have fewer health
problems. The data suggests cattle that get sick are less likely to
grade than cattle that are healthy.” ISU
studies show cattle treated twice or more for bovine respiratory disease
(BRD) have a 33% reduction in grading premium Choice. Animal
scientists indicate an increase in health problems at larger yards could
be caused by the labor-to-cattle ratio, feeding younger commodity cattle
and added stress. Ted
McCollum, Texas A&M Extension beef cattle
specialist, says health might be related to demographics. “A
lot of the smaller feedlots buy more calves locally,” he says. “With
the larger feedlots, a lot of those cattle are being transported for
longer distances. They’re subjected to a different level of stress.” That
doesn’t mean large feedlots must resign themselves to poorer quality.
Mark Sebranek, general manager of the
34,000-head Irsik & Doll Feedyard
(IDFY), takes steps to prevent health problems from hurting quality
grades and efficiencies. “One
of the more significant steps we take is to work with the customers and
document the vaccination programs being performed at home,” Sebranek
says. “We try to complement the customer’s vaccines with the ones
used at the feedyard.” IDFY,
near Garden City, “If
you can keep the adrenalin out of the cattle, by keeping them relaxed
the whole time, those cattle are going to go to the bunk and eat more
feed,” Sebranek says. “They’ll also
stay healthier.” “There
are some yards in the feeding belt that do a really good job of feeding
cattle the right number of days to get that grade,” grants Chris
Reinhardt of The
weekly slaughter reports typically show 40% to 45% USDA Choice in the
Southern Plains, with the “That
may be reflecting differences in time on feed and in feeding
strategies,” says McCollum. “You can also look at the yield grades (YG)
on those cattle. You’ll see a much higher percentage of yield grade 3s
and 4s in the North. The cattle are fed to a fatter endpoint than what
we normally do in the South.” Success
in sorting keeps YG in check and allows feedlots in all regions to move
beyond averages. IDFY sells about 80% to 85% of its cattle on a grid.
From January to October, it posted a 25.86% CAB acceptance rate, more
than 10 points above the average of all 67 CAB-licensed feedlots. “What
we do by sorting the tops off the cattle—not sending the entire pen at
one time—really helps, especially with the small customers,” says Sebranek.
A variation of 300 to 500 pounds is not uncommon on calves coming into
the same pen at the feedyard. Loy
says sorting is not often linked to high-volume feeding. “That’s not
something the large feedlots have the labor to do, but in the Sebranek
admits IDFY recruits cattle that have the potential to marble. “In
part, the high acceptance rate is because of the cattle received,” he
says. By working with CAB, the feedyard
returns detailed carcass data to many of the customers. “They’re
using that information to find their replacements and buy bulls.” Although
high-quality genetics are important, Reinhardt says they can’t explain
all the differences in grade between small and large yards. However,
coupled with geographic herd trends, genetics may be more significant.
McCollum says, “The genetics are quite different in Sebranek,
who feeds many The
people in charge of sorting, pen riding and feeding make daily decisions
that can help or hinder how those cattle grade. “If
you get your crew in tune with that pride,” Sebranek
says, “there should be no differences between a large yard and a small
one.” These concepts are discussed in a research review authored by Corah and McCully. For more information on their summary, “Declining Quality Grades: A review of factors Reducing Marbling Deposition in Beef Cattle,” contact the authors at 785-539-0123, or 330-345-2333, or view the report on the Web at http://www. cabpartners.com/news/research/declining_quality_grades.pdf.
|
You found this article on http://www.cattlefacts.com.au/MoneyCattle.asp
|